Dec30
Hairy Kate and Trashley: It Doesn't Get Much Fuglier Than That
Posted at 03:26 PM | Permalink
|
Comments (29)
![]() |
When PETA Senior Vice President Dan Mathews was asked about a photo of Hairy-Kate dressed in a hideous fur vest, he said, "Fur adds 20 years and 20 pounds. Maybe Mary-Kate thinks this sad vest made of a dozen dead animals will make her look matronly and deflect the gossip about bulimia."
Think you've got a snappier remark? You know we want to hear it, so comment below!
Posted by Jennifer Cierlitsky






Comments
http://www.collegehumor.com/article:1747293
Posted by: jessica | December 30, 2008 03:53 PM
Hahahaha. Love it! Maybe she is trying to hide
Posted by: payton | December 30, 2008 04:26 PM
I dont know what is more revolting the morgue of tortured animals they are wearing or their yucky skin and hair. I guess the "Trollsens" are the prime example that money cant buy everything, because if it did they would have style and hair products. I mean come on everytime these girls step out into public they look like they just woke up from a broken nights sleep in some New York City gutter. I know they dont have hearts but you would think that they would at least have a mirror. But then again their choice in clothes would dictate that they don't even have a brain. Maybe they have some psycho-somatic condition in which they think they are actually dogs because they sure spend enough money on furs that make them smell and shed like wet dogs. This probably resulted when their parents threw them out a 12th storey window because they were so damned ugly - inside and out. None the less they are the epitomy of disgusting!!!
Posted by: Jason Sydney Norton | December 30, 2008 06:45 PM
i used to admire the olsen twins, but im definatly going off them seeing as they still wear fur!! its truly sick and they should know that!
Posted by: Hayley | December 30, 2008 07:53 PM
Those trolls are fugly and I hope Karma hits them real soon. than again, we all know how Mary Kate didn't send help to health ledger, but instead waited for her bodyguards to remove drugs before emergency was called. People who are cruel to animals are cruel to humans. There is no degrees of compassion.
Posted by: roxanne | December 30, 2008 08:37 PM
Im sure they just wear fur so ppl wud talk about them, since they aren't really famous anymore
Posted by: Allan | December 30, 2008 09:29 PM
1000 words can't explain this terrible picture.......especiially this B$!#%
Posted by: paloma | December 31, 2008 02:56 AM
They are starting to look as dead as their coats. They look like zombies!
Posted by: Fiona | December 31, 2008 06:37 AM
Whether you care about fur animal or not, that simply is a FASHION CRIME!!
Posted by: NT | December 31, 2008 11:59 AM
Hideous little monsters!
Posted by: Judith FFFA | December 31, 2008 12:08 PM
okay, i dont know whats more surprising -no horrifying!-, the fact that their "Fashion" line still exists (seriously? who would wear that crap?) or the fact that they're still famous. WTF? They're washed up has-beens that depend on monstrosities like that vest to get any publicity, good or bad.
Posted by: Jannessa-Kayne | December 31, 2008 01:24 PM
maybe they are hideous underneath and wanna use those animals beautiful fur to improve the looks of themsleves. we all know they need to cover up the ugly outfits they consistenly choose to wear.
Why are they even famous? I haven't seen them do anything worth watching since Full House. And when I see reruns I wonder why I ever liked the show at all.
Posted by: bbr | December 31, 2008 01:44 PM
these two dumbheads are a lost cause.. They will not or never change their NASTY, cruel and SELFISH ways.. yes.. I'm afraid horrid selfish people like these two total nerds really do exist.. I wouldn't bother with them anymore PeTA.. waste of your time and breath.. there will always be cruel and selfish people in the world.. that's why there is so much animal cruelty and abuse.. they do it for money, for some kind of other material gain or benefit.. or like these two twits.. with only half a pea-sized brain between them.. for their selfish desire to wear the 'luxury' of dead animal pelts.. maybe they feel more 'dominant' wearing the dead pelts of poor animals that have suffered so?.. they are seriously a lost cause.. how do you treat these two mentally zombie duos? they can't see reason, perceive, empathize or sense the cruelty involved in the fur trade even though it has been drummed into them so many times!! ? total lost cause ZOMBIES!!!! BIG TIME!!
Posted by: yvonne | December 31, 2008 08:39 PM
My boyfriends hairy butt looks better than her in this vest.
Posted by: Carrol | December 31, 2008 11:35 PM
They are flaunting their cruelty. Enough already!
Posted by: jANNA | January 1, 2009 01:13 AM
Why does everyone insist on taking the lives of the poor helpless animals in the world? Do they not have a brain that functions properly? I mean come on, have a heart! You are embarrassing us all!
Posted by: Jasmin | January 1, 2009 01:44 AM
I have always thought these two to be very weird. Now they are weird furhags! YUCK!
Posted by: Tammy | January 1, 2009 07:56 AM
Ugh! This makes me SO mad....How could they do this?
Posted by: Amanda | January 1, 2009 12:14 PM
Yuck. The stupdity of both these 'ahem' humans astounds me.
Posted by: Amanda | January 1, 2009 07:39 PM
Haha, well they wear fur for one or two reasons, or both.
Take attention away from there bulimia/anarexia, or to take attention away from the fact that one of those bitches supplied some of the drugs that put Heath Leadger over the edge, and everyone hating her for getting off scott free.
Yea, those are two dirty, scandelous, disgusting bitches inside, out and fashion wise.
Posted by: Jessica JaDore | January 2, 2009 08:43 AM
No doubt about it, the animals looked way better in that fur then the troll twins ever could hope to look....I throw up a little every time I look at their hideous faces
Posted by: Karen | January 2, 2009 01:13 PM
i cant belive i used to like them NOT ANYMORE I HATE THE TROLLSENS
Posted by: brooke | January 2, 2009 07:59 PM
Hey, did you see... US Weekly did a page on Ashley that talked about how many animals she kills for each fur item she has been seen in. It's horrible! She has a HUGE handbag that I think is made from chinchilla (sp?). One of her vests is made from coyote. I can't hate a person for liking fur cuz everyone is different. But really, why do they ahve to wear it? I can't hate someone for being who they are. We all like what we like. But really, can she not use faux fur? Who would know the difference and who would really care that she wears fake fur?
Posted by: brandie | January 5, 2009 08:51 AM
It is so disgusting & disturbing to me that they can wear fur, I think it looks so terrible. I don't want to even imagine how many animals they have in their closets. So wrong! I read the US Weekly as well and saw how many animals had been killed so they could wear their hideous outfits--the only thing that looks good in fur is the animals its on.
Posted by: lindsey | January 8, 2009 09:05 AM
i saw that is US while browsing it in the store.. i thought go PETA! good, the more people you reach about the true face of fur (some people might not go on the internet and look it up, or come across it) the better!
Posted by: katie | January 10, 2009 05:44 AM
first of all call them with the right names.
they have brains. they have hearts. they're not monsters. and everyone's selfish in a way. animal rights activists are selfish in a way. i'm selfish in a way. and it's not a bad thing.
not sure about the anorexia thing, but it's true, isn't that a sound reason for wearing fur? and for those who wear real fur, it's important for them. some used to be very poor as kids so now they want ot wear the real stuff.
i wonder if animal rights activists who call other ppl bitch or stuff have compassion.
mary-kate and ashley are two normal cute girls who sometimes wear fur.
a lil suggestion...PETA should think about human rights before animal rights. btw i'm a PETA member and donator.
Posted by: luvsp | February 13, 2009 06:45 PM
Turning in the gate to start spreading idle gossip.
Posted by: unejzut | June 24, 2009 12:20 AM
Okay--I disagree with fur wearing, but I think that condeming the Olsens as evil, etc is wrong as well. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, and judging and playing superior, is exactly the attitude that the killers in slaughterhouses embrace--so why adopt the same attitude? Gandi said we could only resolve problems if we are loving and compashionate ourselves! Disagree with fur? Don't support it. Disagree with the Olsens? Fine, boycott anyting Olsen related. Inform people about the issues, but if they are always theatened it will give the organization a foul rep!
Posted by: Diana F. | July 5, 2009 07:01 AM
teen height weight chart
Posted by: nude | September 22, 2009 06:49 AM