Dude, you guys at PETA are totally awesome.

Cassandra, you are just amazing.

Posted by: Sarah | March 20, 2008 03:52 PM

A bit much.

Posted by: Judith, Freedom Fighter for Animals | March 20, 2008 09:06 PM

Judith, well said!! ;)

Posted by: Maya, CVT | March 21, 2008 11:04 AM

Whether one likes the promo or not, Cassandra still deserves full credit.

Posted by: Mike Quinoa | March 21, 2008 04:53 PM

This is awesome!!!
Mother cows kept continuously pregnant with sore, infected udders, their babies ripped away immediately to become veal all so that adult humans can continue to drink breast milk - the dairy industry is the most perverted, female-exploitive animal industry there is.

This is the perfect parody. Kudos, PETA!

Posted by: CC | March 22, 2008 05:38 PM

CC, so what happens in the wild? Cows have contraception?

Predators ignore the young?

Producing milk unnatural?

I'm more than sure genetic engineering could provide cows that don't have to undergo pregnancy to produce milk, if people didn't actually choose to eat veal. You wouldn't seriously suggest that veal production would end just because dairy ended, would you?

Posted by: rojo | March 25, 2008 06:39 AM

Consequently, milk does not suck.

Ideas like this are humorous however.

Posted by: Ronixis | March 25, 2008 03:46 PM

do u know what happens if cows are not milked??
the develop mastitis(yes, it is a real disease)which can lead to death

Posted by: jessica | April 1, 2008 06:58 PM

Actually, you've got it a bit backwards, Jessica. Like humans, cows only produce milk when they're pregnant, so on dairy farms, they're forcibly impregnated on "rape racks" and have their calves taken away from them to be made into veal. It's true that they can develop mastitis and other ailments as a result, but the cause of it is farmers keeping them in a constant state of pregnancy without any calves to drink the milk that was intended for them.

They'd be just fine without milking if this wasn't happening.

P.S. Soy milk is tastier, better for you, and 100 percent cruelty free. Just saying. :)

Posted by: Jack | April 2, 2008 08:37 AM

Cruelty free? Not so much.

A very large percentage of soy - over 90% - is genetically modified and it also has one of the highest percentages contamination by pesticides of any of the foods we eat.

Soy can lead to abnormality in infants, as well as contains a natural chemical that mimics estrogen. If you feed your baby soy milk, you are feeding it, get this, the equivalent of FIVE BIRTH CONTROL PILLS A DAY.

It contains a clot producing substance, which interfers with your cardiac health.

It contains a growth surpressant which cannot be completely eliminated no matter how you prepare it.

That's pretty cruel to me.

Posted by: Tabitha | April 10, 2008 02:14 PM

why do you care if he/she drinks milk? and if you think soy is so much better why dont you drink your soy n you drink your milk. youre both entitled to your beliefs

p.s

have you ever tried having cereal with soymilk? it sucksssss lol

Posted by: chris | August 15, 2008 12:37 AM

Have you all ever tried rice milk? It has no soy so none of the harmful effects - and it tastes good with cereal!

Posted by: sarah | October 25, 2008 02:00 PM