I like that story , but i think it is cruel to throw any thing on any one who wants to wear fur , or wants to eat meat , they are going to do what they do , whether yall like it or not , but i don't like animals killed for fur either but still..., that is just cruel again that some people do that , they need help bad! it this doesnt get posted its cool i wont lose sleep over it , it is just my opinion .

Posted by: S L W | January 4, 2008 07:09 PM

i was raised against the killing of animals and meat in chicago i have recently moved to missouri and have frequently argued with my co-workers and friends over hunting and the treatment of their animals i wish i knew what to do to change their minds but out here its the thrill of the hunt and to me its killing gods creatures how can that be thrilling. thanks for listening diane

Posted by: diana ishmael | January 4, 2008 11:46 PM

lol @ that picture :P

Posted by: K | January 5, 2008 06:13 AM

PETA does not throw anything at people, whether they wear fur or eat meat.

Posted by: Michele | January 5, 2008 09:29 AM

How is it cruel to throw paint on people who wear fur? They are being cruel by wearing it. Sick people like that deserve to have more than just paint thrown on them! Paint is not cruel...slaughtering animals for their coats is! Anybody who wears fur needs mental help...not the paint throwers.

Posted by: Aleasha | January 5, 2008 02:34 PM

Diana ishmael, I have sympathy for you.

Missouri is a hell on earth for animals and sane, civilized people.

Missouri is the puppy mill capital of the US. Even the legislators there support abusing dogs and ripping off consumers in the puppy mill racket.

That is one dirty, backwards state.

Posted by: kelly | January 5, 2008 04:44 PM

I hit the browse button in the entry form for sexiest vegetarian and nothing happens. What's up?

Posted by: Greg Wright | January 6, 2008 03:53 PM

diana

how is it so wrong to use an animal?

Posted by: Caboose | January 6, 2008 08:46 PM

Only about thirteen percent of Missourians hunt and twenty percent fish. Despite kelly's once again bigoted and prejudiced characterization of an entire state, surely diana could find some like-minded people to jive with. As with most urban areas willing to give up their autonomy for government control, Kansas City and St. Louis typically vote very liberal in elections, but kelly already knows this because she is an expert on the hinterland frontier....if only we all were so civilized.

Posted by: Christopher Cochran MD | January 7, 2008 09:28 AM

What about vegetarian from other countries, not only USA & Canada?.
He estado en Hawaii (Isla grande) muchas vaces asi es que no me interesa el premio, pero es bueno saber que en Peta tambien existen aquel tipo de 'diferencias' :(

Posted by: Ana Maria | January 7, 2008 11:08 AM

Caboose,

Why don't you ask the animal?

Posted by: Mike Quinoa | January 7, 2008 12:14 PM

Aleasha: excellent post!!!

Christopher Cochran: what's your problem always stalking behind great posters like Ana and Kelly! if you need your ultimate kick by harassing lovely ladies you should visit some websites of a lower level - you clocker!!! and concerning your deplorable remarks that animals don't know gratitude i can recommend you the following website: gut-aiderbichl.com - and you shall see their gratitude with your own shortsight-eyes!!!

Posted by: Gentleman | January 7, 2008 02:49 PM

Dr. Cochran, now you are just making yourself look bad.

Posted by: elphaba | January 7, 2008 11:44 PM

Gentleman,

Thanks for the link—those are great 'Fotos', and big too!

Posted by: Mike Quinoa | January 8, 2008 10:31 AM

Hi Mike Quinoa,
i'm so pleased that you enjoy that site - there are also beautiful videos showing how they save the animals - it's worth to go through all of it! until now they saved over 1000 animals and it's a first class education material for all the antibloggers here who pretend that animals have no feelings!

Posted by: Gentleman | January 8, 2008 12:46 PM

Mike

Why doesnt another predator ask anther prey that same question?

Posted by: Caboose | January 8, 2008 04:40 PM

Gentleman

Wow, a real gentleman! Thanks for the support!

Posted by: Ana | January 8, 2008 05:27 PM

Caboose,

If you were an obligate carnivore, then it would be necessary to "use an animal". But, you're not. Considering humans don't require animal products, and it's only humans posting here, then yes, it's wrong or unnecessary to use an animal.

Posted by: Mike Quinoa | January 9, 2008 12:30 PM

i'm sorry but i dont think that throwing paint on someone who is wearing fur is right. should they be wearing the skins of animals? no! but throwing paint on people is only going to make you look like a left wing nut who is completely off your rocker. people will not take you serious if you dont present yourself in a mature manner.

Posted by: no name | January 10, 2008 04:14 AM

I have not eaten meat since I had my colon cleaned out in 1993. The memory of it still haunts me.

I wish every meat eater could go through something like this. That would do more to save animals than all the message boards in the world.

Posted by: Bob George | January 27, 2009 09:50 PM