If you live in Chicago, this is especially important for you, because Mayor Richard Daley and Alderman Ed Burke are working hard to repeal one of the most important animal protection laws ever passed, the Chicago foie gras ban. Meat-industry lobbyists are putting enormous pressure on Chicago's aldermen to repeal the law, and the aldermen may vote any day on whether or not to repeal the ban.

For those not familiar with it, foie gras is a “delicacy” made by shoving pipes down the throats of ducks and geese in order to pump massive quantities of fat and grain into their stomachs until their livers become painfully diseased. The ducks are then violently killed, and their bloated, diseased livers are sold as foie gras. Foie gras is so cruel it has already been banned in 15 nations—including the U.K., Germany, Israel, and Switzerland—as well as in the state of California. Even many grocery stores, including Whole Foods, refuse to sell foie gras.

If you live in Chicago, please click here to find out how you can help keep this horribly cruel product banned in your city.

We’re also currently blitzing Chicago TV stations with this ad featuring Sir Roger Moore, the best 007 ever . . .



Comments


this atrocity has to stop worldwide - also in france - where it makes almost part of the 'culture'! but hear me france - this is not civilized!!!

Posted by: ultimate chance | May 24, 2007 02:40 PM

in these modern times i really cannot understand that these horrible things are still allowed to happen! in which century are we living?

Posted by: animalfriend | May 24, 2007 02:47 PM

it is all about money....how shameful....these birds suffer so because greedy persons make money from their misery, pain and deaths.....:(

Posted by: Ana | May 24, 2007 05:26 PM

it is all about money....how shameful....these birds suffer so because greedy persons make money from their misery, pain and deaths.....:(

Posted by: Ana | May 24, 2007 05:26 PM

Who would want to eat such a thing, anyway? As a Chicago native, I am proud that Charlie Trotter, one of the best chefs in the world, supports the ban.

Posted by: Laurie | May 25, 2007 02:43 PM

Now how sad and sardonic is this. For once it was banned and its been asked to be made legal again! I remember watching the video Peta released on foie gras, honestly, it literally made me sick. The reality of the video would be enough to make any person in his/her right mind to find foie gras distasteful and alarming!

Posted by: Caroline | May 26, 2007 04:05 AM

If this is going to be in discussion again then it should be a complete mockery of the bill which was passed initially banning foie gras. Don't these people in the law get it ? Foie gras is disturbing and sick.

Posted by: Angel | May 26, 2007 04:13 AM

Foie gras is probably one of the most shameful practices. Its beyond my understanding how somebody would want to consume foie gras in the first place especially when you know what it actually is and how its made.

Posted by: Sylvia | May 26, 2007 04:20 AM

The entire concept of foie gras seems primitive to me. Obviously the eyes of these demonic meat lobbyists is on the money they can mint. What they should know is its perturbing and sick and so are they.

Posted by: Haley | May 26, 2007 04:25 AM

I didnt` know this about the birds.It make me sick to see these beautiful birds sufferning and for what so some greedy people can get richer.We better be scared for the love of money it could be us next.

Posted by: Joyce Johnson | July 31, 2007 12:55 AM

What a sad reality of life that someone would advocate torturing and inflicting pain on an innocent animal so that he or she can enjoy a delicacy.

Posted by: michael sheehy | May 14, 2008 10:13 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)





Post this story to: tagFacebook tagDigg tagdel.icio.us tagNewsvine
More:
 

Recent

Archives

Feeds

Disclaimer

The views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change, and may not represent the views of PETA. They are being provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproduction, or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content, or materials contained in this weblog for personal, noncommercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.

 
Meet Jack Contact Jack